![]() ![]() Which doesn't matter because the concern is LF. ** measurement was done with a different mic. But, all that said, the NFS measurements are within expectation of the groundplane measurement (or, vice versa). BSC is a bit less accurate on a GP measurement. Also, the speaker was slightly tilted but not much so the HF isn't expected to line up. ![]() * ground plane measurements were gated, thus the LF resolution isn't likely to show the same steep drop-off. But, nonetheless, I've attached the GP comparison below.* Also, I've done enough to prove the NFS measruements are accurate and I feel like proving the results with a GP test every time takes away from the legitimacy of the NFS data. I didn't post it in my review because people who don't know what goes in to a groundplane measurement will go "it's not a perfect match" and then I'd have to deal with that nonsense as it spreads like wildfire. I also did a quick GP test to make sure this was "real". ![]() The NF measurements provide confirmation. (^ that is supposed to be interpreted as being funny, in case it doesn't come across) If you like what you see here and want to help me keep it going, please consider donating via the PayPal Contribute button below. For more details about the performance (objectively and subjectively) please watch the YouTube video. And one would also use a subwoofer to help alleviate the bass driver of trying to overextend itself.Īs stated in the Foreword, this written review is purposely a cliff’s notes version. Realistically, this would be expected of a small, lower sensitivity speaker. But also consider what the dynamic compression tests indicate that there is compression going above 96dB.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |